> I agree WikiNaming is more restrictive, but I've found that it is that > restriction that keeps naming conventions very standard. PatLightbody would > always be the WikiLink for my page, but without WikiLinking it could be [Pat > Lightbody], [PatLightbody], or [Lightbody, Pat] or any other combo. > WikiNaming/Linking tends to force people in to a standard way to layout > links and generally produces content that "magically" beings to link itself
I do like that data gets linked to automatically... > to other content, unbeknownst to the user. Ie: every word WebWork would be > automatically linked to the WebWork page -- the author doesn't need to worry But what about "webwork" and "Webwork"? Seems about as clear as [plightbo]... > about, "gee, should this be a link". It essentially let's the author focus > on content and not navigation. But the content ends up being UnnaturalWikiLingo that I personally find AnnoyingToRead. > Just my off-topic opinion on the matter. I'm going to write a filter for My even farther off-topic opinion. Could some combination of the two be made to work? I think [linking] was my favorite feature in snipsnap. I have a lot of other issues with it though ;) --Erik ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
