> -----Original Message----- > From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:33 AM > > > > The problem here is the case of programmatic configuration. > If someone > > writes code to call into the ConfigurationManager to change the > > configs, then they need to be able to generate the runtime > > configuration from it. > > If someone adds/removes configuration -> clear cache. When a value is > needed -> either rebuild the entire cache or just the cache > for that value.
I was thinking it would be good to let them be able to do a series of modifications to the programmatic configuration side then commit them all at once. The runtime configuration is not really a cache, it's another set of data structures that is built from the first set. > > > I agree. How would the sub-apps configuration get loaded? > How are they > > packaged? > > That's a good question. Are there any other frameworks we can look at > for inspiration here? Don't know. I was hoping your experience with Portals and Portlets would enlighten us :-) Jason ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
