> > > > Ok. Then I'd propose that it's removed. :-) Let's keep > simple things > > simple. Sometimes you want flexibility and strategy > possibilities, and > > sometimes you want rigidity and stability. This is a case of the > > latter I think. > > Interfaces are nice to make mock objects of. Let's keep it > around, helps with unit testing I believe :) > > -Pat
ConfigurationManager is just a simple object. There's no overhead in just using it directly. Check out SimpleConfigurationProvider, which does just this. Jason ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
