Heh, lots of blogs being written with webwork lately: perhaps we could call it "blogwork" to leverage such a common use.
For what it's worth, my blog using webwork, sitemesh, and portalwizard is almost done: it's got about 5% of noncritical functionality to finish and it'll be deployable. :) On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Andrew Lombardi wrote: > For what its worth, I just recently wrote a small blog webapp which is > utilizing WebWork 1.3, Hibernate and Sitemesh. Its not at all > feature-rich yet, but it can show the latest version and some usage of > the different technologies. I'd be open to throwing the code up on > sf.net and having everyone hack at it, this could be the putting > together of a nice sample app for version 1.3. And if some of you want > to contribute on a doc for 1.3, I think this would be invaluable to new > WebWork users. > > Anyways, any thoughts on this? > > -a > > Heng Sin Low wrote: > > >For me, nothing beats a good tutorial and non-trivial sample application ( with > >documentation, of course! ). You see, newbies need some sort of pattern or best > >practise to follow. I think the lack of sample application endorsed by the > >webwork team that demonstrate the pattern and best practise in using webwork > >1.x was one significant issue that holding it back. > > > >Btw, I notice the current xroller code in cvs is using common-sql instead of > >hibernate, any reason ? I think it will help to promote webwork better if the > >sample application is build with popular library like hibernate. For e.g, it > >shall generate more hit if the sample application is eventually link from the > >hibernate site. Also, may be there should be some sort of poll to find out what > >area the sample application should cover to help promote the usage of webwork2. > > > >Regards, > >Low > >--- Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>*Sigh* That is sad. It would be great if someone wanted to help work on docs. > >>For me, I don't have the time and energy to work on 2 versions at the same > >>time, so my energy is going into WW2. I'm going to try to make it well > >>documented, to the best of my documentation abilities. This is especially > >>important as Xwork/Webwork 2 is probably conceptually more complex than > >>Webwork 1.x, although it will hopefully be less complex once you get into it > >>because of the lack of annoying little inconsistencies and quirks like the > >>many faces of the ww:property tag. > >> > >>Oh, and if anyone from O'Reilly is reading, I'd certainly be open to > >>contributing to a Webwork book :-) > >> > >>Jason > >> > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Anders Engström [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 7:58 AM > >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Subject: [OS-webwork] WW in BlogLand > >>> > >>> > >>>http://www.freeroller.net/page/chiara/20030320#webwork_rejecte > >>>d_by_my_company > >>> > >>>Sad, but somewhat true. I guess we need an O'Reilly "WebWork > >>>in a Nutshell". IMO WW rocks - but the lack of docs can be > >>>frustrating. I know this is a todo for WW2.0 - but 1.3 will > >>>be around for a while and need better docs too. > >>> > >>>I'm currently collecting my experiences with WebWork - and > >>>will try to create some documentation from this when time > >>>permits. But this won't be enough... so is there an effort to > >>>produce quality documentation for 1.3? > >>> > >>>Something like the docs at http://hibernate.sf.net would make > >>>WW sooo much more attractive. > >>> > >>>Best Regards //Anders > >>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>|===================================| > >>>| Anders Engström | > >>>| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > >>>| http://www.gnejs.net | > >>>|===================================| > >>>|Your mind is like an umbrella. | > >>>|It doesn't work unless you open it.| > >>>| /Frank Zappa | > >>>|===================================| > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > >>Welcome to geek heaven. > >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > >> > >> > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do you Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! > >http://platinum.yahoo.com > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! > >Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and > >the chance of winning an Apple iPod: > >http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en > >_______________________________________________ > >Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
