On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 09:56 PM, Jason Carreira wrote:
Well, if you want to highlight how it beats existing solutions/architectures, then pick on Struts. Picking on webwork1 as the 'problem' solution seems silly. Attack the competition, not your own products. What you said IS honest, I'm not saying you're being dishonest, just that from a marketing perspective, I don't think it's a smart move. When BEA releases a new version, they don't say 'well version 7 sucked, so we came up with version 8', they say 'oracle/websphere suck, and the cool things we added to version 8 fix all THEIR problems'
-----Original Message----- From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 "press release" text for review
1) I don't see the need to cuss webwork1.
I didn't see it that way. I remember several discussions back and forth about feature implementations and whether they should maintain the web-agnosticism or be specifically tailored to web applications, since that's what most people were doing. I think what I said was honest and not derogatory.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
