1) I don't see the need to cuss webwork1.
He's not cussing WebWork. He's explaining what is and why it is.
2) The portlet sentence seems rather bizarre to me, a portal dispatcher? JSR-168 says very little about portals, so a portal dispatcher is certainly not self-explanatory, to me at any rate.
It'd be the equivalent of a servlet dispatcher but adapted to the portlet API. For example, it'd have to deal with separated action/rendering phases, which WW2 is perfectly adapted for right now (IMO).
3) 'Two strategies for handling form submission' seems another odd detail to choose to highlight. Smells too much of 'look at how clever we are for coming up with this trick!' rather than 'this is why the average person should use webwork2'.
I didn't see it that way.
4) 'JPublish is replacing their...'...JPublish isn't a bunch of guys, it's a product.
True. Replace "their" with "its".
I thought the writing was pretty good. I on the other hand question the need for boasting about a beta. It'd be weird to do a press release now, and then a similar one in a week or two when the final release is out.
/Rickard
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
