OK. Is there a use case for this? I don't believe that the fallback property is getting used anywhere currently.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jason Carreira > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 12:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] DefaultComponentManager (fallback?) > > > I believe that allows the hierarchy of component managers > (request -> session -> application) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 11:51 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [OS-webwork] DefaultComponentManager (fallback?) > > > > > > Is > > > > private DefaultComponentManager fallback; > > > > going to be deprecated/removed? What was the intent? > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
