Got it. So for documentation purposes, the default fallback scenario is a component manager at Request scope falls back to Session. Session falls back to Application?
Request --> Session --> Application And fallback basically provides a means for the ComponentManager class to search for an enabler interface by looking in the request's map first, then the session, then the application. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Pat Lightbody > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] DefaultComponentManager (fallback?) > > > Yes, there is a use case. Look at the lifecycle listeners, > they set up fallbacks. > > -Pat > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:04 PM > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] DefaultComponentManager (fallback?) > > > > OK. Is there a use case for this? I don't believe that the fallback > > property is getting used anywhere currently. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf > > > Of Jason Carreira > > > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 12:00 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] DefaultComponentManager (fallback?) > > > > > > > > > I believe that allows the hierarchy of component managers > (request > > > -> session -> application) > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 11:51 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: [OS-webwork] DefaultComponentManager (fallback?) > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > private DefaultComponentManager fallback; > > > > > > > > going to be deprecated/removed? What was the intent? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webw ork > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
