> interactions between ActionFactory types was always kind of tricky Sounds like a very good reason to want to inherit from the carefully built stack in DefaultActionFactory to me.
"Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Whatever your feelings about Inheritance, and I'm not a big fan of implementation inheritance, there are some cases where it's REALLY not a good idea.... Especially where the base class is not designed for nor expecting subclassing... DefaultActionFactory is one of those and changes to it would very likely break subclasses in rather indeterministic ways (interactions between ActionFactory types was always kind of tricky... If I remember, there's one of them in the stack twice for some reason, but it has to be there like that) > -----Original Message----- > From: Darryl Pentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: Re: WW1's DefaultActionFactory > > > You're right... I've ripped all the chapters on inheritance > out of my OO books... bad, bad.... evil inheritance! > > ;) > > "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Well, I guess I would say that's not a good idea on general > principle. It suffers from the "fragile base class" problem > where if we decided to change the DefaultActionFactory, it > might break the special stuff you're doing in your subclass. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Darryl Pentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:41 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [OS-webwork] Re: WW1's DefaultActionFactory > > > > > > Right, which is what I'm doing. But I'm having to copy and > paste the > > Proxy chain from DefaultActionFactory. > > > > I was thinking it'd be nice to be able to simply extend > > DefaultActionFactory and append my additional proxies on to > the end of > > the existing chain. > > > > I'd also pick up any changes/additions to that chain in > > DefaultActionFactory automatically in the core code with > WW1 upgrades > > (not that there'll be any). > > > > No biggie, was just wondering. I guess the response to all > this is... > > upgrade to WW2! ;) > > > > "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > You can create your own ActionFactory and specify your class in the > > webwork.properties > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Darryl Pentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 6:33 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [OS-webwork] WW1's DefaultActionFactory > > > > > > > > > It's a pity that WW1's DefaultActionFactory "factory" > attribute is > > > package protected and not class protected... it'd be useful > > to extend > > > DefaultActionFactory and just append some additional > proxies to the > > > default chain. Or am I missing some basic way of > accomplishing that? > > > > > > This is where the WW2 IoC stuff comes in handy. > > > > > > - Darryl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > ---------- > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ---------- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
