Re: [OS-webwork] Alternate JSTL integration approach

[Frederick N. Brier]

First responses from the Apache taglibs-dev mailing list are negative, 
so never mind on the two classes from the previous email.  If someone 
else on their team changes their mind, then it can be revisited.

I had another thought, although it bothers me to have several ELs in 
your application.  It also requires them to open their architecture 
elsewhere, so maybe I should stick with a hacked version.  Basically the 
JSTL EL has the concept of  implicit objects.  Their 
JSTLVariableResolver gets them from an ImplicitObject class, which has 
the different maps in a PageContext as properties.  It looks like it 
could be refactored to be more generic and allow install additional 
implicit objects such as the top of the value stack or the current 
Action.  You would write in JSTL EL for their tags, but have access to 
Webwork objects.  Is it worth pursuing, or is there a better alternative 
to the JSTL?

Fred.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise 
Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room 
http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork