Unfortunately that won't help since we want some tags to be a certain width while others have the standard width and so on...
/Daniel -----Original Message----- From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 1 december 2003 12:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork and CSS. Another workaround, maybe cleaner : <span class="genericForm"> #bodytag(Form ...) #tag(TextField ...) #tag(Submit ..) </span> and declares any styles: .genericForm table {padding:1px; ...} .genericForm input {color:black; border: ...} ... Cheers. Richard HALLIER Chef de projet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01.40.12.41.52 www.uniclick.org UNICLICK -----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Daniel Pfeifer Envoyé : lundi 1 décembre 2003 12:12 À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] WebWork and CSS. I asked for exactly the same just some weeks ago, unfortunately no one responded. A workaround is to create several .vm templates (which implement class="input1") and use them when you want to have a textfield on your page. I.e. <ww:textfield template="text50px.vm" ... /> /Daniel -----Original Message----- From: Sergiy Barlabanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 1 december 2003 12:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork and CSS. Hi, How can I apply css classes to WW tags? In the resulting HTML I want to have something like this <input type="text" name="email" value="xx" class="input1" /> but i have no idea how i can manage this with webwork:input tag. Regards, Sergey -----Original Message----- From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XDoclet and XWork validators Validators are tied to their action when defined in ActionName-Validation.xml files right? So, why not generate these files from javadoc comments in the code? I'm only familiar with them as they are defined/explained in the JOSP book. If I'm not mistake XDoclet already supports struts validators which I assume work the same way as webwork? I haven't see any cases were you'd define multiple validators for the same property of the same action and use each in a different context. On Nov 30, 2003, at 6:46 PM, Hani Suleiman wrote: > I'm missing something here.... > > so you want external validators, specified in an external xml > configuration file...and you want to generate this file by adding > javadoc comments to the source file that needs the validation, thus > putting in validation code right alongside the code that needs it, > without the benefits of type safety and suchlike? > > On Nov 30, 2003, at 7:41 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote: > >> Can XDoclet currently generate these from javadoc comments in your >> action? >> >> I don't see any references to doing this in the JOSP book. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it >> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help >> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
