Ok. Thank you all.
I've written my own tag extending textfield tag with cssclass attribute. It turned to 
be quite easy :).

Regards,
Sergey 

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork and CSS.


Just create your own theme or extend the existing templates to support 
option CSS attributes?

On Dec 1, 2003, at 5:12 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:

> I asked for exactly the same just some weeks ago, unfortunately no one
> responded. A workaround is to create several .vm templates (which 
> implement
> class="input1") and use them when you want to have a textfield on your 
> page.
> I.e. <ww:textfield template="text50px.vm" ... />
>
> /Daniel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergiy Barlabanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 1 december 2003 12:08
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork and CSS.
>
>
> Hi,
> How can I apply css classes to WW tags? In the resulting HTML I want 
> to have
> something like this
> <input type="text" name="email" value="xx" class="input1" />
> but i have no idea how i can manage this with webwork:input tag.
>
> Regards,
> Sergey
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XDoclet and XWork validators
>
>
> Validators are tied to their action when defined in
> ActionName-Validation.xml files right?
>
> So, why not generate these files from javadoc comments in the code?
>
> I'm only familiar with them as they are defined/explained in the JOSP
> book.
>
> If I'm not mistake XDoclet already supports struts validators which I
> assume work the same way as webwork?
>
> I haven't see any cases were you'd define multiple validators for the
> same property of the same action and use each in a different context.
>
> On Nov 30, 2003, at 6:46 PM, Hani Suleiman wrote:
>
>> I'm missing something here....
>>
>> so you want external validators, specified in an external xml
>> configuration file...and you want to generate this file by adding
>> javadoc comments to the source file that needs the validation, thus
>> putting in validation code right alongside the code that needs it,
>> without the benefits of type safety and suchlike?
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2003, at 7:41 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
>>
>>> Can XDoclet currently generate these from javadoc comments in your
>>> action?
>>>
>>> I don't see any references to doing this in the JOSP book.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
>>> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
>>> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>>> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
>> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
>> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
>> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to