Ok. Thank you all. I've written my own tag extending textfield tag with cssclass attribute. It turned to be quite easy :).
Regards, Sergey -----Original Message----- From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork and CSS. Just create your own theme or extend the existing templates to support option CSS attributes? On Dec 1, 2003, at 5:12 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote: > I asked for exactly the same just some weeks ago, unfortunately no one > responded. A workaround is to create several .vm templates (which > implement > class="input1") and use them when you want to have a textfield on your > page. > I.e. <ww:textfield template="text50px.vm" ... /> > > /Daniel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sergiy Barlabanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 1 december 2003 12:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OS-webwork] WebWork and CSS. > > > Hi, > How can I apply css classes to WW tags? In the resulting HTML I want > to have > something like this > <input type="text" name="email" value="xx" class="input1" /> > but i have no idea how i can manage this with webwork:input tag. > > Regards, > Sergey > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XDoclet and XWork validators > > > Validators are tied to their action when defined in > ActionName-Validation.xml files right? > > So, why not generate these files from javadoc comments in the code? > > I'm only familiar with them as they are defined/explained in the JOSP > book. > > If I'm not mistake XDoclet already supports struts validators which I > assume work the same way as webwork? > > I haven't see any cases were you'd define multiple validators for the > same property of the same action and use each in a different context. > > On Nov 30, 2003, at 6:46 PM, Hani Suleiman wrote: > >> I'm missing something here.... >> >> so you want external validators, specified in an external xml >> configuration file...and you want to generate this file by adding >> javadoc comments to the source file that needs the validation, thus >> putting in validation code right alongside the code that needs it, >> without the benefits of type safety and suchlike? >> >> On Nov 30, 2003, at 7:41 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote: >> >>> Can XDoclet currently generate these from javadoc comments in your >>> action? >>> >>> I don't see any references to doing this in the JOSP book. >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >>> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it >>> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help >>> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it >> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help >> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork