See below > -----Original Message----- > From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > And this is the impression I get. That many core people > (people I highly respect such as Rickard, Dick and Hani) have > no intent of moving off the ww1 platform.
Rickard has publicly said that he intends to move to WW2 when he gets the chance. I haven't even heard Hani say that he is not interested in migrating, when and if WW2 meets his "battle-tested" requirements, much less any other WW 1.x users. > > And here is the biggest part of this identity crisis. As the > official stance is that major enhancements go into ww2 while > ww1 is just maintained for bug fixes, etc. That's not really > the case is it? It's my opinion that we have 2 separate camps > of developers working under the same umbrella of > OpenSymphony->Webwork, but with no real co-operation. Until I > see guys like Hani or Dick actively contributing to ww2, you > can't convince me that you guys are all working from the same > gameplan. > Well, I'm interested to hear the WW 1.x people's take on this. Jason ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
