Here is the link to the previous discussion...
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/openvas-plugins/2008-October/0001
85.html

If you add a security_note() it appears in a separate report. Instead we
could add a statement with the description, "This may be a False
Positive...".

Chandra.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael
Meyer
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 5:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] Possible false positives with CUPS and MySQL?

*** Chandrashekhar B <[email protected]> wrote:
> We had discussed this sometimes back about remote checks for the
> open source based packages since each Linux vendor will have their
> own version management. It was decided that we'll wait for each
> vendor to release the respective security advisory and develop only
> local checks based on that.

I do not agree with that. 

Only develop local checks for such security problems is IMHO not
the best way. We don't know how many users have ever configured local
checks. A lot of users will perhaps only do remote checks. We shouln't
ignore such users.

I think it is better to have a few "false positives" (of course we
have to tell the user that this could be a false positive because we
only check the banner) than not detecting some security problems.

> However, for some important package vulnerabilities, we could go ahead and
> produce the check based on the open source package version and then add a
> note as suggested here. 

Which are the "important" packages? Who define which packages are
"important" and which are not? ;-)

We should come to an agreement about the note we would add to the report.
All plugin-developer should then use this text in their plugins.

Micha
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to