*** Michael Wiegand <[email protected]> wrote: > * Chandrashekhar B [ 8. May 2009]: > > Instead we could add a statement with the description, "This may be a > > False Positive...". > > Yes, I think this would be a good idea. We could define a standard > disclaimer text which plugins could use whenever they try remote version > identification.
Ok, somebody must define this "disclaimer". Any volunteers? :-) I saw that the newest plugins from secpod contains the following: ***** NOTE: Please, ignore the warning if Patch is already applied. ***** Is that enough? Micha _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
