Is it considered proprietary? The source is available, though you need to be a customer.
It sounds like people do want MediaWiki, but my experiences with it as something that can produce a compendium like we what we already offer are poor. Looking for other wikis with full PDF generation has turned up very little that actually works well and without a lot of time spent on it. Though... I guess we can drop the compendium as a PDF. Maybe that is not really necessary. If people feel strongly enough about it, we'll switch to MediaWiki. I hardly want to force a solution on people they do not like. Do we have volunteers that would be willing to get MediaWiki fully working and creating a compendium like article/book? And applying updates as needed? -Geoff -------------------------------------------------- From: "Matthew Mundell" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:53 PM To: "Geoff Galitz" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] OpenVAS Documentation Project >> In their pricing matrix, they state they are free for open-source >> projects. >> We should be able to qualify for that. >> >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/pricing.jsp under the >> "non-profits and open source projects" tab. > > Quite a shame to use a proprietary wiki for OpenVAS, even if the wiki is > free of charge. Please please consider using MediaWiki or some Free > Software alternative. > > -- > Greenbone Networks GmbH > Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrueck, Germany | AG Osnabrueck, HR B 202460 > Executive Directors: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
