> Is it considered proprietary? The source is available, though you need to > be a customer.
>From what I can tell, all they offer is a zero-cost usage licence to projects that qualify. In Free Software terms this is still very much proprietary. Surely we should support projects that allow reuse, like OpenVAS does. > It sounds like people do want MediaWiki, but my experiences with it as > something that can produce a compendium like we what we already offer are > poor. Looking for other wikis with full PDF generation has turned up very > little that actually works well and without a lot of time spent on it. The PDFs on Wikibooks look OK, for what it's worth. -- Greenbone Networks GmbH Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrueck, Germany | AG Osnabrueck, HR B 202460 Executive Directors: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ Openvas-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
