At Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:29:50 +0200, Alien wrote: > > Op woensdag 8 juni 2005 14:12, schreef Takashi Iwai: > > At Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:13:46 +0200, > > > > Alien wrote: > > > > You don't need to define values if the static array is initialize to > > > > zero. In this case, > > > > > > > > static u16 eq_levels[64]; > > > > > > > > would be better. > > > > > > > > > > > > Takashi > > > > > > you sure that this will initialize to 0 ? i seem to remember that C > > > doesn't init arrays to 0... unless there's a memset somewhere, of course, > > > i never wrote kernel stuff... > > > > It's sure. Remeber that I mentioned "static" arrray. > > > > > > Takashi > > hmm, i never knew static arrays were initialized to 0...
Always good to learn something new ;) In practice, kernel hackers prefers to get rid of unnecessary zero initialization from the kernel code since it reduces the resultant binary size, too. Takashi _______________________________________________ Openvortex-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openvortex-dev
