ASAP, I think. As has been mentioned it's trivial to forward the port with a firewall. I agree being able to listen on multiple ports would be slick too.
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:48:31 -0000, James Yonan <j...@yonan.net> wrote: > > I just got a note from IANA confirming that they've assigned TCP/UDP port 1194 > to OpenVPN. > > You can see the allocation here in the global list: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers > > The question, of course, is when should we switch over to using 1194 as the > default? (We're currently using 5000 which doesn't really belong to us.) > > I'd be inclined to make the change before 2.0 final is released. Any other > opinions? > > Of course, this will be moot for those of you who select your own port number > using the "port" directive. It's only a question of changing the default from > 5000 to 1194 when no "port" directive is specified. > > James > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Openvpn-devel mailing list > Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel > -- De gustibus non disputandum est.
