Hi,

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:50:45PM +0300, Henno Täht wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 22:48, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:10:10AM +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> > > assigns a 169.254 address. If this works for you as well then maybe the
> > > tap-win32 developers can dive deeper into this and find out why windows
> > > treats the 'always connected' adapter differently from an 'application
> > > controlled' adapter .
> >
> > I'd assume that windows services are not "bound" to "dynamic" interfaces...
> 
> By dynamic interface you mean an interface which has  "Obtain IP address
> automatically" set?

No, I was thinking about interfaces that sort of "are not always there".

But that was a misconception, the TAP interface *is* always there - what's
application controlled is whether it's "connected to an ethernet cable" 
(virtual, of course) all the time, or only if openvpn tells it so.

But in that my idea doesn't really make sense - it's as if windows wouldn't
start windows sharing if the ethernet cable is not plugged in at boot time.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Reply via email to