Am 28.01.2011 13:09, schrieb Davide Brini: > On Friday 28 Jan 2011 11:57:30 Stefan Hellermann wrote: > >>> Are you using the "multihome" option in the server configuration? As far >>> as I can tell, using "multihome" uses the PKTINFO information to source >>> UDP replies from the correct IP address; however, while it does work for >>> IPv4, I don't know if that functionality has been ported to IPv6 >>> already. I'm CC-ing the devel list as well. >> >> No I haven't tried multihome, and I don't know why I haven't seen this >> option before... Why isn't this the default? >> But, it seems it doesn't work for IPv6 yet, I get this: >> >> Jan 28 11:37:22 openvpn(server)[17978]: read UDPv6 [NO-INFO]: Connection >> refused (code=146) >> Jan 28 11:37:24 openvpn(server)[17978]: read UDPv6 [NO-INFO]: Connection >> refused (code=146) >> Jan 28 11:37:26 openvpn(server)[17978]: read UDPv6 [NO-INFO]: Connection >> refused (code=146) >> Jan 28 11:37:29 openvpn(server)[17978]: read UDPv6 [NO-INFO]: Connection >> refused (code=146) > > Not 100% sure but this may mean that multihome has not been ported to IPv6 > yet. Perhaps you can open a ticket at > > https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn > > (you have to register and login first). > >> With tcp6-server this works. > > Yes, because with TCP the source address selection is performed directly by > the OS internally. Using TCP was indeed the suggested workaround before UDP > multihoming was introduced in OpenVPN. >
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/84
