Hi, On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:53:45PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: > Considering that the last Linux 2.2 update was released 25-Feb-2004 > and the first Linux 2.4 release came 04-Jan-2001, there are no > reasonable reasons to help users to stay on outdated kernels. > I consider this extra code path just waste of bytes ... so lets make > the world simpler.
Basically, I agree on the idea, but I think there's more that should
be thrown out...
#if defined(TARGET_LINUX)
#ifdef HAVE_LINUX_IF_TUN_H /* New driver support */
...
#else
void
open_tun (const char *dev, const char *dev_type, const char *dev_node, struct tu
ntap *tt)
{
open_tun_generic (dev, dev_type, dev_node, false, true, tt);
}
#endif /* HAVE_LINUX_IF_TUN_H */
...
/*
* This can be removed in future
* when all systems will use newer
* linux-headers
*/
#ifndef TUNSETOWNER
#define TUNSETOWNER _IOW('T', 204, int)
#endif
#ifndef TUNSETGROUP
#define TUNSETGROUP _IOW('T', 206, int)
#endif
and of course...
#if LINUX_IPV6 == 0
if ( tt->ipv6 )
msg (M_WARN, "NOTE: explicit support for IPv6 tun devices is not provided fo
r this OS");
#endif
... so: consider this an ACK, but there's more to do :-)
Now, what did we agree was the oldest linux distribution that we wanted
to support? Need to setup a VM with that, and then rip out stuff, and
verify that things still compile, ...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgp9gaMtQTutP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
