Hi, On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:11:11PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: > Thanks! Yeah, this is just something I stumbled upon lately, but I saw > that there are more stuff which can be cleaned up!
Indeed. I think this is actually something for the rest of the v2.3 preparation time... cleaning up plattform after plattform. With the t_client test frame work, and Samuli's build cluster, we can be reasonably sure that things still work... [..] > I think James once said Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.6. However, the > officially supported RHEL4 release is to my knowledge 4.9. That's based on > a Linux 2.6.9 kernel, iirc. I think it would be useful to have RHEL4 buildslave - so we can see right away if we break that system. Even older systems would then have to be fixed on-demand if really needed... Even the embedded world (OpenWRT) moved to 2.6 a while ago :-) gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpvjs0zYN9Rm.pgp
Description: PGP signature