Hi,

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:13:24AM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Currently all of the binary builds we provide[*] are linked to OpenSSL.
> Would having both OpenSSL and PolarSSL builds make sense (e.g. starting
> with 2.4)?

I think it would be a nice option.  We could even start with 2.3.4 with
that, at least for windows... (if PolarSSL can be cross-compiled for
windows...)

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Attachment: pgpF6uHLUyHiJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to