2007/2/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > * would it be useful to move these to a "backup" location rather than > > > deleting them ? > > > > Seems like you answered to that in the rest of your email. > > Well, it was more thinking aloud than answering.. Not being too sure > about the correctness of the statements :D > > > It could approach the audit functionality initially devised by Boris. > > Either we keep a copy of all the workitems, either we track the > > differences. > > Hmm yeah.. I need to remember why can currently not have the > audittrail with the embedded engine ... > > > We are working on the replay functionality, though in the Ruby engine. > > Never forget my question on your blog and the dedicated reply post ;-) > I need a really short term solution, so I can't really wait for this, > but I'm eager to see it :)
I'm sure you already made sure that anything orchestrated by the workflow engine but not within it will fail without failing the engine with it (upon rereading, this sentence feels strange). I do not forget. -- John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFE users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwfe-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
