On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:10:11AM -0300, romina wrote: > Hi John, > well, I was reviewing but I'm still have the same problem than before. > It's related with the sgExpression element, child of process definition. Due > that you only support one sgExpression, process definitions that for example > have <set> ...</set><sequence>...</sequence> > only can have one sgExpression and then I can have several expressions, the > problem only arise in the first level. > So my suggestion is that the element process-definition/sgExpression should > be unbounded (1..OO) in order to avoid that kind of problem. > The other thing is that in the process definition you can also create a > workitem "on the fly", meaning that you could use set, in order to set > fields, smap, map, list, etc. The actual schema doesn't support that, even > the engine does. > Regarding the sgDefinition, I don't see why is necessary having duplicated. > Anyway if you are looking to have the posibility to have before and after > the sgExpression section, maybe you should use a choice instead a sequence, > because in the choice > > So, let me send the file and tell me if you disagree ....
Hi Romina, nice work ! I'll integrate this, enjoy a nice stay at Cuba ! Best regards, -- john.mettraux @ openwfe.org -///- http://www.openwfe.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine OpenWFE-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users
