On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:10:11AM -0300, romina wrote: > Hi John, > well, I was reviewing but I'm still have the same problem than before. > It's related with the sgExpression element, child of process definition. Due > that you only support one sgExpression, process definitions that for example > have <set> ...</set><sequence>...</sequence> > only can have one sgExpression and then I can have several expressions, the > problem only arise in the first level. > So my suggestion is that the element process-definition/sgExpression should > be unbounded (1..OO) in order to avoid that kind of problem. > The other thing is that in the process definition you can also create a > workitem "on the fly", meaning that you could use set, in order to set > fields, smap, map, list, etc. The actual schema doesn't support that, even > the engine does. > Regarding the sgDefinition, I don't see why is necessary having duplicated. > Anyway if you are looking to have the posibility to have before and after > the sgExpression section, maybe you should use a choice instead a sequence, > because in the choice > > So, let me send the file and tell me if you disagree ....
Hi Romina, I've uploaded a new version of the schema at http://openwfe.org/flowdef_r1.6.1.xsd Tell me what you think (of course when you get back to the office :-) ) Best regards and thanks again for your work, -- john.mettraux @ openwfe.org -///- http://www.openwfe.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine OpenWFE-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users
