On 6/7/06, John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/7/06, JP Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi John,
> > > I tried with other permuations and combinations. But I see while
> > > recurring
> > > call to subprocess works fine ( it holds the current data). Calling parent
> > > process ( 1st process of the workflow) , current data is lost..
> >
> >
> > > Is it a defect or there is some workaround?
Hi JP,
I tried this with OpenWFE 1.7.1pre5 :
---8<---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<process-definition name="test" revision="0.0">
<sequence>
<print>${f:i}</print>
<if>
<lesser-than field-value="i" other-value="4" />
<sequence>
<inc field="i" />
<subprocess ref="test" />
</sequence>
<print>over.</print>
</if>
</sequence>
</process-definition>
--->8---
And it worked just fine.
Best regards,
--
John Mettraux -///- http://jmettraux.openwfe.org
_______________________________________________
OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine
OpenWFE-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users
