Hi John,

I tried with your workflow exapmle . I found following error on browser:
Error !

Traceback (innermost last):
File
"/usr/openwfe/open_1.7/openwfe-1.7.0b/webapps/droflo/WEB-INF/src/droflo.py",
line 264, in renderFlow
File
"/usr/openwfe/open_1.7/openwfe-1.7.0b/webapps/droflo/WEB-INF/src/droflo.py",
line 446, in _renderDefinition
File
"/usr/openwfe/open_1.7/openwfe-1.7.0b/webapps/droflo/WEB-INF/src/droflo.py",
line 502, in _renderExpression
File
"/usr/openwfe/open_1.7/openwfe-1.7.0b/webapps/droflo/WEB-INF/src/droflo.py",
line 670, in render
File
"/usr/openwfe/open_1.7/openwfe-1.7.0b/webapps/droflo/WEB-INF/src/droflo.py",
line 896, in _render
File
"/usr/openwfe/open_1.7/openwfe-1.7.0b/webapps/droflo/WEB-INF/src/droflo.py",
line 502, in _renderExpression
File
"/usr/openwfe/open_1.7/openwfe-1.7.0b/webapps/droflo/WEB-INF/src/droflo.py",
line 670, in render
File
"/usr/openwfe/open_1.7/openwfe-1.7.0b/webapps/droflo/WEB-INF/src/droflo.py",
line 1479, in _render
TypeError: get(): 1st arg can't be coerced to
Ignoring this I wrote a simple flow to simulate the situation ,which is pasted under:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<process-definition
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"

xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://www.openwfe.org/flowdef_r1.5.0.xsd"
name="docflow"
revision="1.0">

<description language="default">
concurrence example base version working littlebit
don't change
</description>

<set field="author_name" value="fill this field" />
<set field="FilePath" value="" type="string" />
<sequence>
<participant ref="designer" />
<participant ref="reviewer1" />
<participant ref="reviewer2" />
<subprocess ref="final-round"/>
</sequence>
<process-definition name="final-round">
<subprocess ref="docflow" />
</process-definition>
</process-definition>
I see same problem again. When final-round subprocess calls the parent process ( docflow) I see a brand new page in browser, the old data is lost.I am on 1.7.0b...I tested same flow over 1.6.2 ( which I had not yet removed) I saw identical behaiour.

Can you please see if there is anything worng in flow definition???

Or My wfeversion has got some problem.

Thanks & Regards
JP
John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/7/06, JP Singh wrote:
> Hi John
> Its behaviour is same with or without fields
> option.
> i.e . it opens a new workflow. Old data is lost.

That works fine for me as well :

---8<---




${f:i}






over.









--->8---


Best regards,

John

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
OpenWFE - Open source WorkFlow Engine
OpenWFE-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openwfe-users

Reply via email to