Just wanted to follow up on this. Since everything is a URL, we are in ROA land.
[ http://www.crummy.com/writing/RESTful-Web-Services/cover.png ] Following the best practices, instantiating a workflow amounts to create a resource and therefore we would use a POST. We would also follow the Atom Publishing Protocol (AtomPub) and post an entry with parameters. So.... If the Densha launchers would detect an xforms file in a specific directory matching the workflow name, it could instantiate it on the fly. Hummm... XForms would post the data back to the controller as an entry! Done! Cheers. Pat. > From: John Mettraux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:02:46 +0900 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [openwferu-dev] Re: Densha launch with parameters > > > Hi, > > On 9/15/07, Pat Cappelaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I think that in a real-like application, workflows will be stored in >> databases along with some meta-data and fully versioned. They are not >> really url's (although they can be addressed by their urls if needed. They >> are resources after all ) > > So what's the point then ? Densha cares about URLs. Anything that is > not accessible via a URL does not exist. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenWFEru dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
