On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Diego Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I am working on a web application on rails over openwferu. Also, I
>  need a REST api to interoperate with others modules. I am watching
>  ruote-web (web interface) and kisha (REST api). I need both features
>  but I dont know if they are compatibles with each other. I dont know
>  if I can have both applications running on different ports over the
>  same database. Is this possible?
>
>  In both projects the "workitems" and "fields" tables have the same
>  attributes. Then, it seems that it is possible...

Hello Diego,

well, Pat is working on that (http://github.com/cappelaere) but his
goal is to implement the wfxml-r interface
(http://geobliki.com/articles/2008/04/24/restful-wfxml-accepted-by-the-wfmc)
so he's adding OpenId and OAuth to the mix.

The idea of Pat seems to be to merge Kisha and Ruote-Web together.

I have for now decided to stop the development of Kisha and let Pat
handle that the way he wants. I just work on Ruote-Web and Ruote-Rest
(which is a Kisha--).

Back to your question, the problem with Kisha and Ruote-Web sharing
the same db is about locking workitems and also sharing the engine
rundata. The best way is probably to have a mix of Kisha and
Ruote-Web, with controllers for human consumption and controllers for
restful consumption.

My original idea was to strip the engine out of Ruote-Web and make it
rely on Kisha (or Ruote-Web) as a back-end. But well, I had no time
and it could get complicated to deploy.


So nothing out of the box for now.

Maybe Pat will have his say here.


Best regards,

-- 
John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenWFEru users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to