Thanks for the answer John.

What is the difference between functionality in kisha and ruote-web?

I've been watching the api of ruote-rest:
http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-rest/tree/master/README.txt

In principle, I need a very basic rest api. I should be able to resume
a workitem passing parameters to it.
Is this possible with ruote-rest and "PUT /workitems/{wid}"?

I am assuming ruote-rest is compatible with ruote-web. Am I wrong?

Regards.
Diego.

On 13 mayo, 01:16, "John Mettraux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Diego Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >  I am working on a web application on rails over openwferu. Also, I
> >  need a REST api to interoperate with others modules. I am watching
> >  ruote-web (web interface) and kisha (REST api). I need both features
> >  but I dont know if they are compatibles with each other. I dont know
> >  if I can have both applications running on different ports over the
> >  same database. Is this possible?
>
> >  In both projects the "workitems" and "fields" tables have the same
> >  attributes. Then, it seems that it is possible...
>
> Hello Diego,
>
> well, Pat is working on that (http://github.com/cappelaere) but his
> goal is to implement the wfxml-r interface
> (http://geobliki.com/articles/2008/04/24/restful-wfxml-accepted-by-the...)
> so he's adding OpenId and OAuth to the mix.
>
> The idea of Pat seems to be to merge Kisha and Ruote-Web together.
>
> I have for now decided to stop the development of Kisha and let Pat
> handle that the way he wants. I just work on Ruote-Web and Ruote-Rest
> (which is a Kisha--).
>
> Back to your question, the problem with Kisha and Ruote-Web sharing
> the same db is about locking workitems and also sharing the engine
> rundata. The best way is probably to have a mix of Kisha and
> Ruote-Web, with controllers for human consumption and controllers for
> restful consumption.
>
> My original idea was to strip the engine out of Ruote-Web and make it
> rely on Kisha (or Ruote-Web) as a back-end. But well, I had no time
> and it could get complicated to deploy.
>
> So nothing out of the box for now.
>
> Maybe Pat will have his say here.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> John Mettraux -http://jmettraux.wordpress.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenWFEru users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to