On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Kenneth Kalmer<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:36 AM, John Mettraux <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Kenneth Kalmer<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi everyone >> > >> > I took as much time as I could over the weekend to mirror John's >> > ruote-dm >> > [1] project in a new ruote-activerecord [2] project.
Hi Kenneth, I've just noticed you went on with ruote-activerecord. It's excellent, keep up the good work ! I'm learning a lot [about ActiveRecord and Rspec] by reading your code. There is a small thing that bothers me. What do you think of switching from "WorkItem" to "Workitem". I use "Workitem" in ruote 2.0 (and ruote-dm). What about following in ruote-activerecord ? BTW, I've just pushed a "ticket" branch for ruote-dm. It's the new name of the 'lock' thing I showed you yesterday. 'ticket' is a better name, it's not really a lock. http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-dm/blob/663de25ee361bb1b632dd3d6c48e2885269a43d4/test/ut_2_ticket.rb http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-dm/blob/663de25ee361bb1b632dd3d6c48e2885269a43d4/lib/ruote/dm/ticket.rb Maybe that could find its way into ruote-activerecord as well. I still have to adapt the 'concurrence' expression to use it though. Maybe I could do the "port" by myself with you as the reviewer/committer. I still have to prove it works for ruote-dm / concurrence, hence the branch. And well done with your presentation : http://www.opensourcery.co.za/2009/08/25/ruote-in-20-minutes-video/ ! Cheers, -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
