On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Enrico Bianco <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm interested in joining ruote-activerecord development. I want to > switch the current project I'm on to ruote 2.0 but we're currently > using the ActiveRecord-persisted engine and ruote-activerecord would > be the equivalent for ruote 2.0. > > What's the best way to get started?
Hello, Kenneth, the author or ruote-activerecord is currently doing an Italy trip, he'll be back home (ZA) next week. I'd suggest forking http://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-activerecord and then trying to run the specs against along with the latest ruote 2.0. ruote-activerecord is aligned on ruote-dm (http://github.com/jmettraux/ruote-dm), IIRC ruote-ar is quite complete. The next step for ruote-dm is the implementation of history storage, this will then have to be ported to ruote-activerecord (if needed). Running the specs of ruote-activerecord is important, but there is another "angle of attack" for testing : running ruote functional test suite with ruote-activerecord. It's quite easy, from ruote 2.0 (and assuming that ruote-activerecord/ is at the same level as ruote/ (2.0)), you can do ruby test/functional/test.rb --activerecord This will use the activerecord expression storage for all the functional tests (fingers crossed). I'll ping Kenneth about you volunteering. Thanks for the help, cheers, P.S. what is the thing about sequence { sequence { x } } getting wobbly on ruote 0.9.x ? -- John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ you received this message because you are subscribed to the "ruote users" group. to post : send email to [email protected] to unsubscribe : send email to [email protected] more options : http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
