Hi,

i have the same problem using kexec with buffalo whr g54s openwrt rc2 
kernel 2.4:

kexec_load failed: Success
entry       = 0x298000 flags = 0
nr_segments = 2
segment[0].buf   = 0x2ac37008
segment[0].bufsz = 27307b
segment[0].mem   = 0x1000
segment[0].memsz = 297000
segment[1].buf   = 0x456338
segment[1].bufsz = 1a4
segment[1].mem   = 0x298000
segment[1].memsz = 1000

is there any solution for this?


Am 07.02.2009 12:25, schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Le Saturday 07 February 2009 05:45:44 Brian J. Murrell, vous avez écrit :
>    
>> I have an asus wl500gp that I'm trying to kexec a kernel on.  I had
>> written about this before but have another bit of info and I'm hoping it
>> rings a bell for someone so that I don't have to through the painful
>> process of printk() instrumenting the kernel and flashing new kernels
>> with more and more debug.
>>
>> Anyway, my command line is:
>>
>> # kexec -l /vmlinux-2.6.25.20 --append="root=/dev/sda1 rootfstype=ext3
>> noinitrd console=ttyS0,115200 init=/etc/preinit"
>>      
>
> That's a valid command line.
>
>    
>> where /vmlinux-2.6.25.20 is build_dir/linux-brcm47xx/vmlinux.elf from my
>> build tree.
>>
>> kexec -l returns:
>>
>> kexec_load failed: Success result = 89
>> entry       = 0x29f000 flags = 0
>> nr_segments = 2
>> segment[0].buf   = 0x2ac33008
>> segment[0].bufsz = 27a07a
>> segment[0].mem   = 0x1000
>> segment[0].memsz = 29e000
>> segment[1].buf   = 0x458440
>> segment[1].bufsz = 194
>> segment[1].mem   = 0x29f000
>> segment[1].memsz = 1000
>>      
>
> It seems to me like the entry is not valid here, it should be around
> 0x80010000 or so, but I need to check whether the entry reported here is the
> entry point i the ELF header.
>
>    
>> and "result", 89 is what is returned from kexec_load() in my_load() in
>> the kexec-tools package.  I dug a bit but could not really find anything
>> in sys_kexec_load() or it's callees that would return "89",
>>      
>
>    
>> Anyone with any ideas at all?
>>
>> Anyone actually using kexec on a mips architecture with success, just so
>> I know I am not chasing a pipe-dream?
>>      
>
> I have been using kexec successfully on rb532 w/ 2.6.24, and apart that it did
> mangle the serial console ouput, the kexec'd kernel booted fine, but that was
> prior to upgrading to kexec-tools-2.0.0. I will give it a try and report back
> here.
>    
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>    
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to