Hi, > My plan was to put the bcm4716 related stuff into the patch directory > for kernel 2.6.37 and stay at 2.6.36 as default kernel for trunk until > the new stuff is somehow stable. I think we should get this really work > soon as it hardware is out for 1.5 years now. > > Hauke
It would be great but must to get a rid of those 4 SSB_BUG_ON(1) in pmu r5/r6 code I left in patch for them. Otherwise its too much dangerous to let it get built for anything else besides 4716. Might get back to that in few days as soon as done with fixed code for AI bus core. Unfortunately I put too much messup to ssb core abstraction layer with changes made. I was plain wrong in few assumptions being blinded with mips-only part of the bus code base. Thanks to Michael Buesch I got another understanding of things how they are done currently and therefore how could they be done to avoid such a messup and provide clean way of these two buses coexistance on signle code base. I'm still sure SB and AI are both much more SSB rather than SSB SB and lets say BCM AI code wise. It could have been changed if only more technical implementations' background is awailable for AI but unfortunately no .pdf's from Broadcom. Now back to subject. Think we could leave it as it is for few days - might get some reports from bcm4716 owners. I will publish fixed decision in few evenings after done with code changes and tests for SB code on non-mipses. Its really long time to get it finally supported after 1,5 years since release but think it can wait 1ne more week still ;) Have nice day, George _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
