On Friday 01 April 2011, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 01/04/11 03:27, Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote: > > Ok I found the script. > > > > read-all-adm output attach. > > Thanks very much. It's not vital, but if you still have the setup ready, > could you remove the VLAN related config from your /etc/config/network and > run the script again? It would be helpful if the driver didn't configure > VLANs before running the register dumping script. > > Other than that, I've had a quick look, and it doesn't make me happy. First > and foremost, the product ID for the FC and M chips is identical down to > the last bit! They reserve a whopping 32 bits for a "Chip Identifier" and > still they both read 0007:1023! So there doesn't seem to be a standard way > to tell the chips apart. Well I suppose if all else fails it will have to be a module parameter, but that would definitely be second best.
David > > And they do seem to differ, which makes sense. There is a lot in common. I > could really use the datasheet for the -FC variant, but all the so-called > datasheets for that chip I've found describe a completely different > device. Its a shame that Ubiquiti, who after all ship Openwrt with their board, can not be prevailed upon to provide some information. Over time I have accumulated three adm6996 datasheets, one for the L variant, one for M and one for F (but not FC). The M one is vast (7MB), but the F is small (700K) and the L 1.7M. I can email them to you direct if you want as I suspect the list would not appreciate them being broadcast. I have no idea where I got them from although none are marked confidential so they should be freely distributable. David > > I even get the impression that the values read from your chip aren't the > power-on-reset default values. Perhaps there's an EEPROM attached with > settings specific to your router. > > I do see one possibility for hope. Maybe Infineon at some point stopped > producing the real FC variant described in those datasheets I found, and > from then on simply relabeled their M chip and sold that as the FC > variant. Discrepancies in default values could be explained by an EEPROM > with router-specific settings. > > Thanks for your help, > > Peter. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
