On 6 Mar 2013 at 2:35:44 PM"Gert Doering" <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > In that case, make this a "+5", at least :-) - more RAM, more Flash, > GigE switch, faster CPU, ... > There's really no reason for a 54GL anymore, unless you specifically > need > *that* hardware, for example because you have a highly customized > image already... No custom images here. We mainly went with the WRT54GL last time because that is what we had used before. We use a stock image, then we install WiFiDog, bandwidth management and tweak the settings in /etc/config (for example, we switch the LAN and WAN ports so that the 4 "LAN" ports act as a switch on the WAN and the single "WAN" port is on the LAN). Out of curiosity, what kind of throughput do you see on the wired and N wireless connections? Now that I see these, I may also replace the WRT150N and DIR-601 that I am running (both running OpenWRT) with something that will handle higher throughput.
Thanks Aaron Z _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
