On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n.mavrogiannopou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Andre Heider <a.hei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> could you please add nettle-mini support and make this a build variant >>> instead of a config option, please? >>> Build variant has the advantage that we can precompile it as ipks because we >>> cannot enable dnssec by default. >> I posted a patch to fix nettle-mini builds to the dnsmasq list. Once a >> fix is merged I'll include that in this package. >> The ipkg suggestion sounds nice, but, as Zhou mentioned, that'll give >> 4 variants already. Is that really what we want? > > Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way > to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in.
DNSSEC support adds a dependency. Even with libnettle-mini that's already 167K on my ar71xx. But yes, with support compiled in its can be disabled at runtime, see patch 4. Regards, Andre _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
