On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Christian Schoenebeck <christian.schoeneb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > we got a new ticket inside OpenWrt Ticket #18018 with problems inside LuCI > app. > This is normally not an OpenWrt ticket it's a LuCI ticket, but the user don't > know. > If the user try to post the ticket at LuCI trac it takes weeks before the > ticket > is reported by LuciTrac to the mailing lists. So for a me as an "external" > developer > there is no chance to help quick. [...] > My idea is to move code of LuCI applications like tinyproxy, samba, hd-idle, > ddns-scripts, ..... > to OpenWrt/packages as samba/samba-luci, tinyproxy/tinyproxy-luci or > ddns-scripts/ddns-scripts-luci. > The mwan3 package already doing this. > > I think this is the best way, because openwrt/packages are moving fast forward > and needed changes to the corresponding LuCI apps needs to be in sync. > What do you think ?
I concur, my impression with the luci part of the project is that it is unable to cope with any changes/new functionality proposal. It would be nice to respin it as part of packages. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
