Am 07.10.2014 um 20:16 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 19:24 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I think about abandoning the LuCI Trac entirely and only accept patches
>> sent to the mailinglist, I lack time and resources to keep it running
>> and spam-free.
>>
>> So please resend the patches to the LuCI list in case you haven't done
>> already and I'll try to get them merged until tomorrow.
>
> Wouldn't it be more efficient if luci was on github too? (even as a
> separate repository but with multiple committers)
>
And possibly close TRAC on LuCI because I've seen a lot users posting inside
OpenWrt's forum and ticket system.
>From user point of view it's absolutely OK.
The "user" only downloads the LuCI app to get the functionality mostly not
knowing what is happening behind.
Thats the reason for a GUI.
I think we want to give more functionality than manufactures are doing,
the reason why technically interested users start with OpenWrt like I did 2
years ago.
1st step was to use my box with the prebuild image and the Web UI and
starting from there to find a way into the internals of OpenWrt.
For me still many things are not clear, but I continue to "try and error" to
find out.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
