Quoting "Robert P. J. Day" <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>:
I just tripped over this: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/18220 Is there a known workaround for this? And how exactly does one handle this type of generic "Provides" functionality in .ipk packages? Surely this sort of thing has been done before, no?
Never mind, I just saw the "PROVIDES" directive in a couple Makefiles, I'm assuming the proper fix is that all "openvpn" variants should PROVIDE the functionality of "openvpn", yes? rday _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel