Quoting "Robert P. J. Day" <rpj...@crashcourse.ca>:

I just tripped over this:

https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/18220

Is there a known workaround for this? And how exactly does one handle this
type of generic "Provides" functionality in .ipk packages? Surely this sort
of thing has been done before, no?

  Never mind, I just saw the "PROVIDES" directive in a couple Makefiles,
I'm assuming the proper fix is that all "openvpn" variants should
PROVIDE the functionality of "openvpn", yes?

rday
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to