I believe it is due to the hardware NAT not supported. On Mar 10, 2015 9:52 AM, "Michael Richardson" <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > valent.turko...@gmail.com <valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why it OpenWrt slower than stock firmware? I can help by shining a bit > > of light onto this subject. I'm developing custom firwmares based on > > I'm curious about this claim to begin with. > Of the people who say this, how many of them actually know how to measure > such a thing? > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ > ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
