On 20/06/2015 20:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 20 June 2015 at 13:56, Jo-Philipp Wich <j...@openwrt.org> wrote: >>> i dont like this idea at all. calling ld-preload on every started app >>> just seems wrong >> >> I was the one suggesting the idea since we needed a solution which does >> not require modification of downstream programs. We could restrict the >> preloading to programs which requested stdio relaying support from procd >> and not preload for the rest. > > AFAIK there are 3 solutions to this: > 1) Modifying every app we want to support with procd + logging > 2) Using PTY which I tried in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/486670/ > 3) Using LD_PRELOAD > > The PTY was pointed as not the best choice, so that's why I continued > with LD_PRELOAD. As Jo-Philipp pointed, it's the same solution > "stdbuf" uses. I'm afraid there isn't any better alternative :( >
oh well, i still dont like it but that is not really relevant i guess ... :) _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel