On 2015-09-17 15:05, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > From: Alexandru Ardelean <a...@ocedo.com> > > The idea is that we may only need the libnl core, > or libnl-route or libnl-nf libs, but maybe not all of them. > > This way we can select which ones we need without bloating the > firmware image too much. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleana...@gmail.com> Maybe it would be better to have libnl as a metapackage selecting libnl-core + the other ones. The way you split the package, you might be breaking some packages that depend on it.
Or did you review all of the packages to ensure that they only need the core? - Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
