On 2015-09-22 14:42, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > Anyway, moving forward with the split: > 1) Do I rename the libnl package to libnl-core and make libnl a > metapackage that pulls in everything ? or > 2) Do I leave this structure as is (with the fixes/updates I'll add > later) and update those packages to pull only the libfiles that are > needed ? > For 2), I'd of-course need the approval/blessing of the package > maintainers above. > > From my point of view any of these 2 approaches is fine, because I can > just pull whichever libnl-xxx package I need. I prefer 1), and then start updating packages individually to only pull in what they need.
- Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
