Op ma, 3 dec 2018 om 5:51 , schreef John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org>:
On 03/12/2018 16:56, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just going through the oldest PRs on GitHub, and I've noticed,
that ath79
> submissions are being more preferred between maintainers and that
ar71xx PRs
> are basically stalled, there are 24 open PRs for ar71xx Vs 14 open
PRs for
> ath79. So I'm wondering, what's the plan, is ar71xx being slowly
and (quietly
> :-)) turned into 'fixes only' mode and new devices/features should
be now
> added to ath79/DTS only? Thanks!
>
> -- ynezz
The idea was to fade out ar71xx after the next release and only accept
new boards for ath79. However i'd been fine taking that step as of
now.
i have noticed that the ath79 patches far out number the ar71xx ones.
we
have lots of patches that migrate boards and i have seen a few new
boards added only to ath79. lets see how the thread goes, looking fwd
to
hearing opinions...
John
Rather than further duplicating efforts, I'd 'encourage'* ath79 only
submissions.
Stijn
* Sounds nicer than enforcing. But I actually mean the latter :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-adm mailing list
> openwrt-...@lists.openwrt.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-adm
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
