пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 21:20, Christian Lamparter <chunk...@gmail.com>:
> > The only problem here is that not all platforms need it. > The problem I always have is more along the way that a patch should receive > some "on-device" testing. So I do look forward for patches that received a > "Tested-by:" tag or has positive replies from random/unlikely people. But > we sadly all know that this system has its limits. In this case mine is really tested on a device if that really matters in this case;-) I don't think there can be any problems with this simple approach. Regarding "not all devices" I meant that that eeprom.sh when added to global base-files, will be useless for many platforms. I added DIR-825B1 to ath79 and it needed some hacks to get eeprom and mac, there is no way to upstream this type of methods. But it is an old device. But without these patches many devices have disabled wireless on first boot after flashing, because caldata is not ready in time. Fixing this annoying behavior is important. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel