W dniu 20.02.2021 o 20:46, Rui Salvaterra pisze: > Hi, Tomasz, > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 16:55, Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Rui, >> >> aside from copying patches also files should be split, since some >> ESPRESSObin variants are merged upstream and with keeping files as they are >> now, we will overwrite changes done upstream. >> Additionally just a small nit inline. > > This is just a brainless copying. The idea is to split the bringup > into logical steps, as suggested by Adrian Schmutzler [1]. Since > setting the kernel testing version is the last of the patch series, > this should have no influence at all in the build.
Adrian also mentioned "files". You can treat "files" as patches since they add/replace files in kernel source tree. I was missing this change, so commented here, since that's the closest. You can check my tree as I also suggested that to Sebastian in [2]. 2. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2021-February/033868.html > >> W dniu 20.02.2021 o 12:53, Rui Salvaterra pisze: >>> >>> create mode 100644 >>> target/linux/mvebu/patches-5.10/312-ARM-dts-armada388-clearfog-emmc-on-clearfog-base.patch >>> create mode 100644 >>> target/linux/mvebu/patches-5.10/312-helios4-dts-status-led-alias.patch >> >> I missed this, when sorting patches. When copying please change the index of >> helios4-dts-status-led-alias.patch to 313. > > Will do, thanks! > > Rui > > [1] https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3886#issuecomment-781562000 > -- TMN _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
