On 4/19/21 11:26 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 4/19/21 8:59 AM, Andre Heider wrote: >> On 19/04/2021 08:51, Florian Eckert wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>>> If there are some other bugs in the 21.02 branch which are fixed in >>>> master, we can backport the fixed as long as they are not so big. If >>>> there is something missing, just ask on the mainling list. >>> >>> Since last weekend the following patch was merged into master. >>> The patch extends ltq-vdsl ubus interface with the missing state_num >>> and power_state_num values. >>> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/4407d45d9667ab3d376ad4a6b760e07f4dd43e49#diff-ff00a3f4f318bb11684e008813bd876f0865ce6c2c681ec26b0bf178b4e83163 >>> >>> >>> Could we please backport this to the branch openwrt-21.02 before rc1 >>> stable release? >> >> Let's get these two patches in too: >> >> 48162e4c0c85a7f64d9007565bf5be2c7ace3ada lantiq: enable G.INP >> retransmission counters >> 4f27ea7c33447f4b0c8e577509726927916b9625 lantiq: use ActualNetDataRate >> for speed reporting >> >> With those 3 patches 21.02 matches master with the big ubus dsl metric >> change. > > I added these 3 patches, but only after tagging. > > We should do a 21.02.0-rc2 in 2 to 3 weeks anyway. > > Hauke > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > .
Now that openwrt-21.02-rc1 is tagged, would it be possible to have an "openwrt-21.02" section for the Reported Version on bugs.openwrt.org? While at it, why is it still possible to file bug reports for lede-17.01? Perry _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel